Public opinion is our supreme court: D W Cathell MD, The Physician Himself.

نویسنده

  • D Neuhauser
چکیده

D aniel Webster Cathell MD (1839–1925) began writing his book ‘‘The Physician Himself’’ in 1882 to help new physicians in America prosper. His book was so popular that it was in its tenth edition in 1892, last revised in 1922 and republished in 1931. In those days, before the reforms in American medical education driven by the Flexner report of 1910, it was easy to become a physician—many men did so, but only a few prospered in this competitive world of private practice. These struggling practitioners were Cathell’s readers. Cathell wrote so well it is best to quote him directly. In 1890 he wrote: ‘‘The standard has fallen lower and lower, until we have at last reached a point at which the ... brainless bumpkin ... who is following the plow ... thinks he can find a place where he can be metamorphosed into an MD tomorrow and that a sign or doorplate with his name (and the prefix Doctor) on it and a buggy at his door is about all that is necessary.’’ (1890, page 9) At the court of public opinion Cathell said the doctor had to behave with dignity, look the part, and show himself properly to his hoped for patients. In 1890, when home visits were at the center of practice, the doctor either walked or went by horse to see his patients. ‘‘If you unfortunately have a bony horse and a seedy looking ... buggy, do not let them stand in front of your office for hours at a time, as if to advertise your poverty, lack of taste or paucity of practice.’’ (1890, page 22) By 1922 Cathell was recommending a car which, unlike the buggy horses, did not get tired going up hill. ‘‘Clean hands, well-shaved face or neatly trimmed beard, unsoiled shirt and collar, unimpeachable hat, polished boots, spotless cuffs, well-fitting gloves; fashionable, well made clothing of fine texture, cane, sun-umbrella, neat office jacket ... indicate gentility and self respect.’’ ‘‘The majority of people will employ a well-dressed medical man with clean genteel appearance and manners; always neat but never gaudy. They will accord him more confidence, and willingly pay to him larger bills; even though he may have a homely figure and a baboon-face.’’ (1931, page 27) In the doctor’s office, diplomas and ‘‘modest size busts or statues of our great medical heroes are ... in excellent taste’’, as is a nice book case with medical books in it (1931, pages 11–12), ‘‘but display no miniature museum of sharks’ heads, stuffed alligators, tortoise-shells, impaled butterflies, miniature ships, ... mummies, snakes, ... tape worms, devil-fish or any thing else that will advertise you in any light other than that of an educated and cultivated physician.’’ In that era ‘‘A knowledge of Latin to a limited extent is of inestimable value. Employ some scholar to teach you at least as much of the elements of Latin as you need in writing prescriptions, etc. You can get one at a small cost by advertising anonymously in any daily paper.’’ (1931, page 51) The physician is a public figure about town. Don’t be seen ‘‘loitering around drug-stores, hotel-lobbies, saloons, club-rooms, cigar-stores, billiard-parlors, barber-shops, corner-groceries, moving pictures etc with ‘splendid fellows’ who love doing nothing ...’’ (1931, page 15) In those days it was called the doctor’s bed side manner. ‘‘Never ask the age of a patient more than once during attendance on his case. Take care also neither to ask any questions twice at the same visit nor to do anything else that would indicate lack of memory, lack of interest or incompetence.’’ (1931, page 211) ‘‘It is very pleasing to the sick to be allowed to tell in their own way whatever they deem important for you to know. Allow every one a fair hearing, and, even though their long statements are tedious, do not abruptly cut them short, but endure them and listen to them with respectful attention.’’ (1890, page 44) ‘‘... a bold, prompt act, that strikes the right nail on the head, done with unwavering steadiness of mind and nerve, if successful, often leads almost to idolatry ...’’ (1890, page 44) ‘‘Act toward timid children and nervous patients so as to remove all dread of your visits. Avoid a set sad countenance, solemn and formal or funereal solemnity of visage and manner, as it would give rise to thoughts of crape, hearse, undertaker, and grave, and to dread of you, especially if you accompany it with a corresponding mode of dress. If you have a lengthened visage, or your air and movements are naturally awkward, sombre, or singular, offset them by cheerfulness, suitable dress, etc.’’ (1890, page 46) A public appearance of cheerfulness, hope, kindness, manners, purity of mind and politeness will create respect, confidence, reputation, and popularity. For success, combine these traits with medical knowledge soundly applied and with out error. Speaking of errors: ‘‘Never write a prescription carelessly. Legibility is the first requirement, neatness the second, Cultivate the habit of scrutinizing every thing you write after it is written, to assure yourself that there is neither omission nor mistake and sign your name or initials to every prescription, but not until you have satisfied yourself that it is as intended. Mistakes are seldom discovered unless at the moment of their occurrence.’’ (1890, pages 178–9) Cathell wrote about good business practices. Be paid in cash, not credit. The doctor should manage his own personal health by not working to exhaustion. The measured outcomes of ‘‘professional tact and business sagacity’’(1890, page 291) were no debts and money in the bank, paid promptly by grateful patients who could easily seek care elsewhere. ‘‘There are two kinds of reputation a physician may acquire—a popular one with the people and a purely professional one with his brethren. These are often based on entirely different grounds and are usually no measure of each other ...’’ Try to possess both.’’ (1890, page 39) Unlike Cathell who spoke to the average struggling practitioner, academic physicians focused on specialization, research, and peer reputation. Their work was in large city hospitals and not the small towns. Many of them scorned the court of public opinion. After all, what do patients know about the science of medicine? These academics taught future generations of physicians. Flexner’s reforms closed medical schools which catered to ‘‘boys from the plow’’, reduced the number of physicians and thereby reduced 389

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (but We’re Not Sure Why)

Using qualitative data and historical methods, Barry Friedman asserts with confidence that “we the people” influence the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Using quantitative data and statistical methods, political scientists are not so sure. Despite their best efforts to validate basic claims about the effect of public opinion on the Court, the evidence remains mixed at best. We enter this d...

متن کامل

Using Twitter to Study Public Discourse in the Wake of Judicial Decisions: Public Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Cases∗

At the intersection of behavioral and institutional studies of policy-making lie a series of questions about how elite choices affect mass public opinion. Scholars have considered how judicial decisions—especially US Supreme Court decisions—affect individuals’ support for specific policy positions. These studies yield a series of competing findings. Whereas past research uses opinion surveys to...

متن کامل

Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that several provisions of the 1982 Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act were unconstitutional because they obstructed a woman's right to abortion. These provisions included requirements that a woman be advised of possible medical assistance for childbirth and of the father's responsibility for child support, and that a physician inform the woman of abortion's detrime...

متن کامل

Supreme Court Responsiveness: An Analysis of Individual Justice Voting Behavior and the Role of Public Opinion

This study attempts to explain why the Supreme Court responds to public mood by analyzing individual justice liberalism and comparing it to public liberalism between the years of1970 and 2001. Three theories suggesting why the Court may respond to public opinion are discussed, including the replacement, political adjustment, and the attitude change hypotheses. The method of using Court reversal...

متن کامل

Towards Tracking Political Sentiment through Microblog Data

People express and amplify political opinions in Microblogs such as Twitter, especially when major political decisions are made. Twitter provides a useful vehicle for capturing and tracking popular opinion on burning issues of the day. In this paper, we focus on tracking the changes in political sentiment related to the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and its decisions, focusing on the key dimensio...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Quality & safety in health care

دوره 14 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005